Pocius v. Halvorsen
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hershey
This is a suit begun by the plaintiff to recover $7,000 paid to the defendant as attorney’s fees pursuant to an allegedly contingent fee contract. Since the plaintiff recovered nothing in a prior suit in which she was represented by the defendant, she contends that the fees paid by her as the suit progressed should be refunded. After a bench trial, the court decided all issues in favor of the defendant and awarded him an additional fee of $4,021.65 pursuant to a counterclaim. The Appellate Court affirmed this decision and we allowed leave to appeal.
The record discloses that the plaintiff in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gair v. PeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- United States Trust Co. v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
- Tonn v. ReuterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- In re FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Soper v. BilderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Bernier v. BurrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Walter P. Maksym, Jr. v. Dolores LoeschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- In Re Estate of CallahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Wald v. Chicago Shippers Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.