Legal Opinion

Pocius v. Halvorsen

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1963No. 37877PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hershey

This is a suit begun by the plaintiff to recover $7,000 paid to the defendant as attorney’s fees pursuant to an allegedly contingent fee contract. Since the plaintiff recovered nothing in a prior suit in which she was represented by the defendant, she contends that the fees paid by her as the suit progressed should be refunded. After a bench trial, the court decided all issues in favor of the defendant and awarded him an additional fee of $4,021.65 pursuant to a counterclaim. The Appellate Court affirmed this decision and we allowed leave to appeal.

The record discloses that the plaintiff in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gair v. PeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. United States Trust Co. v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Tonn v. ReuterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. In re FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  5. Soper v. BilderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Bernier v. BurrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Walter P. Maksym, Jr. v. Dolores LoeschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. In Re Estate of CallahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Wald v. Chicago Shippers Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API