Legal Opinion

State v. Odenbrett

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 25, 1984No. CX-83-148, C1-83-149PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT,' Justice.

Defendant-appellant seeks reversal of his conviction of two counts of criminal sexual conduct in the second degree on the ground that the evidence of his guilt should have been excluded because it was obtained or derived from information provided by personnel at a private health care center in violation of either defendant’s physician-patient privilege or of his right to privacy. We hold that the evidence was properly received and affirm.

On April 14, 1982, defendant William Odenbrett, age 27, married and illiterate, voluntarily admitted himself to the young adult mental…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. United States v. BayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. In Re LifschutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. PatricelliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. State v. GulleksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. R.S. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. People v. Gearhart, New York County Courts1990
  5. State v. CampaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API