Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Warn (In re Warn)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California

Decided January 22, 2001No. Bankruptcy No. 99-13251; Adversary No. 00-1027Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum of Decision

ALAN JAROSLOVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.

This court has always considered In re Nourbakhsh, 67 F.3d 798 (9th Cir.1995), to have created a bad rule of law. In that case, the Ninth Circuit held that a default judgment is to be given collateral effect in subsequent bankruptcy discharge-ability litigation.

The exceptions to discharge crafted by Congress were intended as a compromise between the public interest in the discharge of debt and the private desire to preserve debt. Under the compromise, fraud and other types of malicious debt are to be excepted from discharge. By allowing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schwab v. Rondel Homes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Barragan v. Banco BchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Nemeth v. TrumbullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Green v. Kennedy (In Re Green)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. California Novelties, Inc. v. SokoloffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API