Schwab v. Rondel Homes, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROUSSARD,J.
—This case presents the question of whether a plaintiff’s failure to serve notice of damages upon a defendant pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 425.10 and 425.111 precludes the plaintiff from taking a default against the defendant. We conclude that a plaintiff may not take a default against a defendant without giving the defendant actual notice as required by statute.
I. Facts
Plaintiff Bill Allen is deaf and uses a signal dog. He and his roommate, plaintiff David Schwab, wished to rent an apartment in Lincoln Terrace, an apartment complex owned and managed by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- J. R. Norton Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Greenup v. RodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Gourley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Uva v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Plotitsa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Manufacturers Life Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Electronic Funds Solutions v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Ovando v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Sickle v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Matera v. McLeodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.