Legal Opinion

Schwab v. Rondel Homes, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1991No. S012426PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROUSSARD,J.

—This case presents the question of whether a plaintiff’s failure to serve notice of damages upon a defendant pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 425.10 and 425.111 precludes the plaintiff from taking a default against the defendant. We conclude that a plaintiff may not take a default against a defendant without giving the defendant actual notice as required by statute.

I. Facts

Plaintiff Bill Allen is deaf and uses a signal dog. He and his roommate, plaintiff David Schwab, wished to rent an apartment in Lincoln Terrace, an apartment complex owned and managed by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. J. R. Norton Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Greenup v. RodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Gourley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Uva v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Plotitsa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Manufacturers Life Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Electronic Funds Solutions v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Ovando v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Sickle v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Matera v. McLeodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API