Legal Opinion

California Novelties, Inc. v. Sokoloff

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1992No. G011260PublishedCited by 6 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SONENSHINE, J.

Paul Sokoloff appeals from entry of default and default judgment in favor of California Novelties, Inc. (California Novelties) and Cindy Madsen Gray. He further appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to set aside the default and default judgment as void by virtue of an award of damages of which he was not provided adequate notice.

I

On October 29, 1982, California Novelties and two of its officers and directors, Cindy and William Gray, filed a complaint alleging Sokoloff, a former vice-president, director and major shareholder of California Novelties, had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Greenup v. RodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Becker v. S.P v. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Devlin v. Kearny Mesa AMC/Jeep/Renault, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Uva v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. JADE K. v. ViguriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matera v. McLeodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Schwab v. Southern California Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. FOOTHILLS TOWNHOME ASSN. v. ChristiansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Backlund v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. California Novelties, Inc. v. SokoloffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API