Legal Opinion

O'Shaughnessy v. Baxter

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 22, 1877PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGray, C. J.

This is an action of tort against a constable of Boston for an assault and false imprisonment. The material facts of the case, as they appear from the statements in the report and the findings of the jury, are as follows: This plaintiff, whose real name is John O’Shaughnessy, was sued by the name of John Shaughnessy, a name by which he was commonly known, upon a promissory note signed by another person of that name, and not by himself. The person who made the writ knew that the plaintiff was not the person who signed the note, but intended to have the writ served upon him, and it was served…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Griswold v. SedgwickNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  2. Underwood v. RobinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. President of Hallowell & Augusta Bank, Inc. v. HowardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mays v. SudderthCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Hoppe v. KlapperichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Fisher and Fisher v. PayneSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. Jordan v. C. I. T. Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Cavitt v. McCriteWashington Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API