Legal Opinion

Hoppe v. Klapperich

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 1947No. Nos. 34,312, 34,362PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Plaintiff brought an action against Hilda M. Klapperich, her attorney, Allen Atwood, Art Mclntee, sheriff of Stearns county, and W. Y. Henning, municipal judge of the city of St. Cloud, for (1) malicious prosecution, and (2) abuse of process. Each defendant interposed a separate demurrer upon the ground that the complaint did not state a cause of action. This is an appeal from the orders sustaining the demurrers.

Upon demurrer, we are concerned not with a determination of the truth of plaintiff’s allegations, but with the sole problem of whether such allegations are (1) legally…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Broom v. DouglassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Wood v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  4. Allyn v. MatherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1832
  5. Erskine v. HohnbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Mozzochi v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Hardy v. VialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  4. L & H AIRCO, INC. v. Rapistan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Stafford v. MusterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API