Legal Opinion

Cavitt v. McCrite

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1938No. 26881. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

In the complaint in this case, there are, separately stated, three causes of action. By the first, the plaintiff sought general damages for wrongful imprisonment. By the second and third, he sought special damages resulting from the alleged wrongful imprisonment. The defendants answered separately, denying liability and setting out an order of the superior court of Clark county which directed the sheriff of that county to take the plaintiff into custody and confine him in the county jail. By a reply to these answers, the plaintiff alleged that the order by reason of which he was taken into…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allyn v. MatherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1832
  2. In Re CavittWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. O'Shaughnessy v. BaxterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. Johnson v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Barr v. CombsOregon Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bender v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Turngren v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Guffey v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Pallett v. ThompkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Choukas v. SeverynsWashington Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API