Legal Opinion
Rinaldo v. Syracuse University
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 16, 1976PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We agree with Special Term that third-party plaintiffs responses to interrogatories served upon it by third-party defendants were not unresponsive nor may they be construed to be a willful failure to disclose information sufficient to impose the drastic remedy of preclusion (CPLR 3126; see Livingston v Mayes, 23 AD2d 814; Practice Commentary, Siegel, McKinney’s Cons. Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR 3126, p 646-650). Although CPLR 3133 (subd [a]) requires that objections to interrogatories be made within 10 days after service of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Coffey v. Orbachs, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Livingston v. MayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
3Cited by7 opinions
- Niesig v. Team IAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- McGuane v. M.C.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Newark-Wayne Community Hospital, Inc. v. Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Lane—The Real Estate Department Store, Inc. v. Ziv Chestnut Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Johnson v. MorgantiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.