Niesig v. Team I
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bracken, J. P.
Subject to certain exceptions not relevant to this case, DR 7-104 (A) (1) of the Code of Professional Responsibility prohibits a lawyer from communicating with an adverse party whom he knows to be represented by an attorney in connection with the subject matter of that representation. The principal question presented on this appeal is whether the plaintiffs attorney may, consistent with the prohibition contained in DR 7-104 (A) (1), communicate on an ex parte basis with certain individuals who, as employees of the corporate third-party defendant, are…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Zimmer v. Chemung County Performing Arts, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia Ex Rel. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bland v. ManocherianNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Niesig v. Team INew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Arons v. JutkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Polycast Technology Corp. v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Papanicolaou v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Shamis Ex Rel. Wishbone Trading Co. v. Ambassador Factors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.