Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Morganti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 1990No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly ordered that defendant need not answer certain interrogatories that requested information about defendant’s customer list, parts list, price list, membership in business organizations, blueprints of machinery and related information. Plaintiffs failed to establish that such information was indispensable or could not be acquired in any other way (see, Curtis v Complete Foam Insulation Corp., 116 AD2d 907, 909). Plaintiffs’ contention that defendant’s objections were untimely lacks merit (see, Rinaldo v Syracuse Univ., 51…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Curtis v. Complete Foam Insulation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Rinaldo v. Syracuse UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. MorgantiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API