Struhs v. Protection Technologies, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KIDWELL, Justice.
Marvin Struhs appeals from a decision by the Industrial Commission awarding his employer’s insurance company a subrogated interest in Struhs’ third-party settlement for injuries sustained in a work-related automobile accident. We affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A. Facts.
Marvin Struhs worked for American Protective Services (APS). APS and its successor, Protection Technologies, Inc., provided security services at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) (now INEEL). A member company of the Wausau Insurance Companies (Wausau) provided worker’s compensation coverage…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- State v. RaudebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- Jones v. State Board of MedicineIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Naig v. Bloomington SanitationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Runcorn v. Shearer Lumber Products, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Martinez v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Robison v. Bateman-Hall, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Frazier v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Hamilton Ex Rel. Hamilton v. Reeder Flying ServiceIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Jen-Rath Co. v. Kit Manufacturing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. WeberIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.