Femme Comp Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
This consolidated postaward bid protest comes before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record, plaintiff Femme Comp Inc.’s motion to supplement the administrative record, defendant’s motion to strike, and defendantintervenor BearingPoint, Inc.’s motion to strike. Plaintiffs Femme Comp Inc. (“Femme Comp”), Technical and Project Engineering, LLC (“TAPE”), L-3 Services, Inc. (“L-3 Services”), Data Systems Analysts, Inc. (“Data Systems”), and BearingPoint, Inc. (“BearingPoint”) protest the Army Contracting Agency’s award of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Pgba, LLC v. United States, and Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Linc Government Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- DMS All-Star Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Tech Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Afghan American Army Services Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- FirstLine Transportation Security, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.