Legal Opinion
Lotter v. Clark County Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1990No. 20339PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order granting Clark County’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.
Facts
Appellant Carlos J. Lotter purchased a home on or about May 16, 1986, and shortly thereafter discovered numerous structural defects. The home’s framing had been inspected by and received final approval from the Clark County Department of Building and Safety on July 16, 1973. On May 27, 1987, Lotter filed an action against the seller, real estate broker, real estate agent, and respondent Clark County, Nevada. Clark County subsequently moved for summary…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Butler v. BogdanovichNevada Supreme Court · 1985
- Oak Grove Investors v. Bell & Gossett Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. All Electric, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Nevada Lakeshore Co., Inc. v. Diamond Electric, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1973
- Allstate Insurance v. FurgersonNevada Supreme Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by14 opinions
- School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Tahoe Village Homeowners Ass'n v. Douglas CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Calloway v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- Alsenz v. Twin Lakes Village, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1992
- Nardozzi v. Clark County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.