Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. McAlester-Edwards Coal Co. v. Fall

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 3, 1922No. 3695PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. Petition for mandamus by the United States, on the relation of the McAlester-Edwards Coal Company, against Albert B. Fall, Secretary of the Interior, and others. From a judgment denying the writ, relator appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEE, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia denying a writ of mandamus to compel the Secretary of the Interior and the other formal respondents to receive a balance alleged to be due upon the purchase price of certain coal lands in Oklahoma and to issue a patent therefor.

It is alleged by the petitioner, the McAlester-Edwards Coal Company, and admitted by the government, that, under the provisions of the act of Congress of July 1, 1902 (32 Stat. 641), the Secretary of the Interior reserved the lands' in question from allotment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Lane v. HoglundSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reichelderfer v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
  2. Work v. United States ex rel. RivesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1924
  3. McCarl v. United States ex rel. Societa Ligure Di ArmamentoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
  4. Katsh v. RaffertyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API