Legal Opinion
Reichelderfer v. Johnson
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 25, 1934No. 6082PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HITZ, Associate Justice.
The appellee filed a petition in the court below praying a writ of mandamus to the appellants commanding them to issue a permit authorizing him to sell beverages, including beer containing one-half of 1 per cent, of alcohol by volume and not more than 3% per cent, of alcohol by weight. The issuance of permits to soil such beverages within the District of Columbia is regulated by the act of April 5, 1933 (73d Cong., 1st Soss., e. 19 [D. C. Code Supp. 1, 1933, T. 20, 1801 and note, 1802-1816]). The particular form of permit *553desired is what is designated by that act as an…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States Ex Rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hammond v. HullCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- State of Illinois v. David FerrieroCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
- Charles Peckat Mfg. Co. v. JareckiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- In re Alaska Labor Trades Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1945
- Chandler Laboratories, Inc. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.