Legal Opinion

Adams v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 30, 2011No. 10-60CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON LIABILITY

BRADEN, Judge.

I. STATUTORY AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND.1

Effective January 1, 2004, Congress authorized civil service employees in the Veterans Health Administration (“VHA”) within the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) to be compensated at their basic pay rate, plus an additional twenty-five percent above their basic pay rate for work performed between “midnight Friday and midnight Sunday” 2 (referred to herein as “premium pay”). See Veterans Health Care, Capital Asset, and Business Improvement Act of 2003, Pub.L.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Etchegoinberry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Athey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Octo Consulting Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API