Legal Opinion
Dyegard Land Partnership v. Hoover
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 11, 2001No. 2-99-361-CVPublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARDNER, Justice.
Owners of lots in a rural, residential subdivision sued the developer for a declaratory judgment that restrictive covenants applicable to their lots did not prohibit drilling wells for water. The developer appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the lot owners, contending that amended covenants, which it unilaterally executed and filed after the dispute arose, expressly prohibit the proposed water wells. Alternatively, the developer contends that the original covenants on file when the lots were purchased prohibit the proposed water wells. We affirm in part and…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. CatesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. Gennedy, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- Raman Chandler Properties, L.C. v. Caldwell's Creek Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Murray v. BEJ Minerals, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Uptegraph v. Sandalwood Civic Club, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
- Buckner v. Lakes of Somerset Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.