Legal Opinion

Richard D. Brew & Co. v. Auclair Transportation, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 21, 1965No. 5300PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant carrier emphasizes the provisions of s. 2(c) of the bill of lading and contends according to its terms that it is liable only for the amount of the premium on the insurance- policy procured by the plaintiff shipper. The insurance company, which is subrogated to the rights of the plaintiff shipper, emphasizes the provisions of the insurance policy that the insurance shall not “inure directly or indirectly to the benefit of any carrier,” and contends that it is not subject to the limitation of liability contained in the bill of lading. These contentions are neither novel nor new…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Phœnix Insurance v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. The Turret CrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  4. Graysonia, Nashville & Ashdown Railroad v. Newberger Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  5. Hartford Fire Insurance v. PayneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hildreth v. BergeronSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Auto Driveaway Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  3. Amica Mutual Insurance v. Auto Driveaway Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Centennial Insurance Co. v. Haley Transfer & Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Deasy v. Dernham Co. (In Re Blondheim Modular Manufacturing, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API