Legal Opinion
Graysonia, Nashville & Ashdown Railroad v. Newberger Cotton Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 29, 1926PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
Three separate actions were instituted in the Howard Chancery Court. The plaintiffs in the actions, the Newberger Cotton Company and the Lesser-Groldman Cotton Company, are foreign corporations authorized to do business in this State as cotton brokers, and during the year 1923 engaged in that 'business in this State. The actions were instituted against? the Craysonia, Nashville & Ashdown Railroad Company, a common carrier for hire in this State with its line of railroad extending from Nashville to Ashdown, and the Mineral Springs Farmers’ Union Warehouse & Marketing Company, a bonded…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Jelke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
- Bradley v. Lehigh Valley R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- Insurance Co. of North America v. EastonTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Pennsylvania R. Co. v. BurrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bolton v. ZieglerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
- Dixey v. Federal Compress & Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- UPI v. Hernreich, D/B/A Station KZNGSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Ark-Homa Foods, Inc. v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Hand v. Northwestern National Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.