Legal Opinion
Hildreth v. Bergeron
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 31, 1970No. 5976PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.
Defendant’s exception to the denial of his motion to dismiss on the pleadings was reserved and transferred by Leahy, C. J. In determining this issue all facts properly pleaded by the plaintiff and all reasonable inferences therefrom are considered as true. Aldrich v. Beauregard & Sons, 105 N. H. 330, 200 A.2d 1.4.
The plaintiff claims that the defendant agreed to provide insurance to cover all contingencies or accidents which might occur during the operation of his retail grocery business. Paula Gilbert was injured by the explosion of a Coca-Cola bottle purchased at the plaintiff’s store and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sanderson v. BalfourSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1968
- Ainsworth v. ClaremontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
- Burke v. BurnhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951
- Coos Lumber Co. v. Builders Lumber & Supply Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963
- Hutt v. HickeySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Saunders v. CarissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Leeper v. LeeperSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Greenland v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- American Home Assurance Company v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Bricker v. Sceva Speare Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.