Steinhardt & Bro. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 8106 (T. D. 37403). [Oral argument Jan. 9,1919, by Mr. Washburn and Mr. Hanson.]
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
Silk-lined baskets composed of raffia, wood, cane, and willow were classified by the collector of customs as manufactures in chief value of silk, and were claimed by the importers to be baskets in chief value of bamboo, wood, straw, compositions of wood, or of like materials. .
The Board of General Appraisers sustained the classification of the collector, which decision was reversed by this court on May 8, 1918. Steinhardt & Bro. et al. v. United States (8 Ct. Cust. Appls., 404; T. D. 37646). A rehearing having been granted to the Government, however, the case was reargued on January 9, 1919,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Steinhardt & Bro. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
3Cited by9 opinions
- Veit v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- Nurserymen's Exchange v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Rico Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- International Expediters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- Quon Quon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.