Legal Opinion

Nurserymen's Exchange v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 21, 1958No. C. D. 2044PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DoNLON, Judge:

These nine protests, consolidated for trial, have to do with merchandise described as “Tree Fern Totem Poles,” imported from Japan and entered at San Francisco. The collector classified the merchandise under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as nonenumerated manufactured articles, not specially provided for, and he assessed duty at the modified rate of 10 per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiff’s protests initially claimed, alternatively, classification either under paragraph 1558, as nonenumerated unmanufactured articles, not specially provided for, or under paragraph 1548, as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steinhardt & Bro. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  2. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. United States v. LarzelereCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. United States v. SteebCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rico Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Berkery, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. Nurserymen's Exchange v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. Nurserymen's Exchange v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API