Quon Quon Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mollison, Judge:
The merchandise the subject of these protests bears invoice item numbers 1117 and 1118, the former being described as “Rattancore oblong table top” and the latter as “Rattancore round table top.” Duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 50 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 411 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for baskets of wood, not specially provided for.
Various claims are made in the protests and by timely amendment thereof, the claim principally relied upon being that for duty at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 412 of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. SchoverlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Norma Co. of America v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Robertson v. GerdanSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. Byrnes & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Quon Quon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957