Legal Opinion

International Expediters, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 28, 1955No. 59235; protest 212690-K (New York)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the items marked “A” on the invoice accompanying entry 785583, referred to as “slingex,” consist of articles composed wholly or in chief value of rattan core or reed of about one-quarter of an inch in diameter, from which the cane, skin, or peel has been removed. Following the principle of the decisions in Steinhardt & Bro. et al. v. United States (9 Ct. Cust. Appls. 62, T. D. 37940) and Calif-Asia Co., Ltd. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475), it was held that the merchandise is excluded from the provision for articles, wholly or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Steinhardt & Bro. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Byrnes v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API