Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Lloyd

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1972No. 11067PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Claiming to be the holder of a life estate in certain real property occupied by the defendant-appellant, the plaintiff-respondent commenced this action to obtain possession of the realty and to recover damages. Upon the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, the district court entered what it termed a “partial summary judgment”; the defendant appeals therefrom, contending that the court resolved genuine issues of material fact in reaching its decision.

This Court may, on its own motion, dismiss an appeal from an unappealable intermediate order or decision. State ex rel. State Board of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coeur D'Alene Turf Club, Inc. v. CogswellIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State Ex Rel. State Board of Medicine v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Clear v. MarvinIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Perkins v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Perkins v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hutchins v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Twin Falls County v. KnievelIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. City of Coeur d'Alene v. OchsIdaho Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API