Legal Opinion

City of Coeur d'Alene v. Ochs

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1974No. 11362PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

Plaintiff-respondent City of Coeur d’Alene instituted this action to compel defendant-appellant Esther L. Ochs to remove certain buildings which allegedly did not meet the requirements of the city’s building code.

After a non-jury trial, the court entered a judgment on December 20, 1971, which in pertinent part orders:

“2. That the defendant within one year repair all structures on [defendant’s] premises to bring them within the requirements of the Building Code of the City of Coeur d’Alene, or demolish and remove said buildings within that time, or should the defendant fail…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Howell v. ReimannIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Perkins v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Van Houten v. BurtIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Perkins v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Lloyd v. LloydIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Puphal v. PuphalIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Fenich v. Boise Elks Lodge No. 310Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Fenich v. Boise Elks Lodge No. 310Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Mendenhall v. CaineIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Puphal v. PuphalIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API