Legal Opinion
In re Glenn Robinson, Esq. (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 22, 2019No. 2018-112PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
¶ 1. A hearing panel of the Professional Responsibility Board concluded that respondent, Glenn Robinson, Esq., violated several of the Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct-Rules 1.7, 4.3, 8.4(d), and 8.4(g)-based on his relationships with two former clients. The panel imposed a sanction suspending respondent from the practice of law for two years and placed several conditions on respondent's ability to resume practice. This Court ordered review of the hearing panel's decision, pursuant to Administrative Order 9, designating the Office of Disciplinary Counsel as appellant. A.O. 9 § 11(E).…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Matter of KushnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- In Re BerkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- In Re WrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- In Re ElginDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re BergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kirk Wool v. Office of Professional RegulationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- In re John Paul Faignant, Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- In re Richard Bowen, Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2021
- In Re C. Robert Manby, Jr., Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2023
- In Re Norman E. Watts, Esq. (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.