Legal Opinion

In re John Paul Faignant, Esq.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 8, 2019No. SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 2019-093PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Id . (alterations and quotations omitted).

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ORDER

¶ 1. Petitioner filed a petition for extraordinary relief, asking this Court to order Bar Counsel to refer for investigation a complaint he made against an attorney. Bar Counsel moves to dismiss the petition. We grant his request. We agree with "every jurisdiction that has ever confronted" this issue and conclude that petitioner fails to "an allege injury sufficient to confer standing." Boyce v. N.C. State Bar , 814 S.E.2d 127 , 134 (N.C. Ct. App. 2018) (recognizing that many individuals have "taken issue with a state bar's failure to act on a disciplinary grievance and then sought…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Parker v. Town of MiltonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  4. In Re: Constitutionality of House Bill 88Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949
  5. Akinaka v. Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kirk Wool v. Office of Professional RegulationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  2. The Bank of New York Mellon v. Daniel T. QuinnSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025
  3. Green v. Comm'n on Judicial DisabilitiesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Stephen Aguiar v. David WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  5. Lefrancois v. Killington/Pico Ski Resort Partners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API