Legal Opinion

State v. Gomez

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 20, 1976No. 2 CA-CR 821-2PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KRUCKER, Judge.

This is an appeal from convictions of forgery, A.R.S. § 13-421, and theft by embezzlement, A.R.S. § 13-682, and concurrent sentences thereon of not less than eight nor more than ten years on the forgery charge and not less than eight nor more than ten years on the embezzlement charge.

We are asked to answer four questions on appeal:

1. Should the court have granted a dismissal because of lack of a proper preliminary hearing transcript, or, in the alternative, have ordered a new preliminary hearing?

2. Was there sufficient evidence to convict the defendant ?

3. Was the title…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. TinghitellaArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. State v. HoffmanArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. MaxwellArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. GeorgeArizona Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. EdgarArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. ReaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  3. State ex rel. McDougall v. Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman Jr.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman Jr.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API