Legal Opinion

State v. Rea

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 22, 1985No. 2 CA-CR 2921PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVERMORE, Judge.

Defendant, convicted of one count of forgery under A.R.S. § 13—2002(A)(1), appeals on the grounds that the evidence is insufficient and that an instruction on criminal simulation as a lesser-included offense should have been given.

The evidence established that blank checks were taken from Magellan Associates. One of these, made payable to defendant and signed by a fictitious person, was presented and endorsed by defendant, using his driver’s license as identification, and cashed by a bar in Tucson. There was no direct evidence that defendant filled in any portion of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. McGannArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. SchadArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Territory of Arizona v. BarthArizona Supreme Court · 1887
  4. State v. GomezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. State v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. FramptonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. AlvaradoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. City of E. Cleveland v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. LivanosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. State v. AlvaradoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API