State v. Rea
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LIVERMORE, Judge.
Defendant, convicted of one count of forgery under A.R.S. § 13—2002(A)(1), appeals on the grounds that the evidence is insufficient and that an instruction on criminal simulation as a lesser-included offense should have been given.
The evidence established that blank checks were taken from Magellan Associates. One of these, made payable to defendant and signed by a fictitious person, was presented and endorsed by defendant, using his driver’s license as identification, and cashed by a bar in Tucson. There was no direct evidence that defendant filled in any portion of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. McGannArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. SchadArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Territory of Arizona v. BarthArizona Supreme Court · 1887
- State v. GomezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- State v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. FramptonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. AlvaradoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- City of E. Cleveland v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. LivanosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- State v. AlvaradoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.