Legal Opinion
State v. Hoffman
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 4, 1955No. 1051PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LA PRADE, Chief Justice.
This appeal is from a judgment finding the defendant, Ben Hoffman, guilty of selling his assets with the intent to defraud his creditors, in violation of section 43-2603, A.C.A.1939, which reads as follows:
“Every debtor who fraudulently removes his property or effects out of this state, or fraudulently sells, conveys, assigns or conceals his property, with intent to defraud, hinder or delay his creditors of their rights, claims or demands is punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six (6) months, or by fine not exceeding five thousand dollars…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hartzell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Rush v. FrenchArizona Supreme Court · 1874
- Gates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- State v. ParsonsArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. BeckwithIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. NartenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State v. RutledgeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Everett v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1960
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.