Nixon v. Nixon
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court in this paternity and support action after we remanded the matter for filing of exceptions nunc pro tunc. Commonwealth ex rel. Nixon v. Nixon, 312 Pa.Super. 313, 458 A.2d 976 (1983). We must reverse and remand for the reasons herein stated.
The facts in this case were set forth by the trial court in the following manner:
Appellee, Annie Nixon, and appellant, Earl Nixon, Sr., were married in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on December 2, 1953. On October 20,1953, Earl Nixon, Jr. was born of this marriage. The parties separated in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Novelty Knitting Mills, Inc. v. SiskindSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Blofsen v. CUTAIARSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. AndreasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth ex rel. Weston v. WestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Turek v. HardySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- John M. v. Paula T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- John M. v. Paula T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Brinkley v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Brinkley v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- John M. v. Paula T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.