Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Keller

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1987No. 8629DC867PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

Defendant assigns error to the trial court granting plaintiffs’ motion for a directed verdict on the basis that “as a matter of law, the language of [the] easement is not ambiguous and that [the] easement is appurtenant to the lands of Plaintiffs.” Defendant contends that the easement is not appurtenant to the lands of *210the plaintiffs but appurtenant to the lands of James C. Boozer and that the trial court should have directed a verdict in defendant’s favor on this issue. Alternatively, defendant argues that the language of the easement is ambiguous and that the trial court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. North Carolina National Bank v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Shingleton v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Hensley v. RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Thompson v. . UmbergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Weaver-Rogers Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Intermount Distribution, Inc. v. Public Service Co. of North Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Edwards v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API