Cochran v. Keller
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
I
Defendant assigns error to the trial court granting plaintiffs’ motion for a directed verdict on the basis that “as a matter of law, the language of [the] easement is not ambiguous and that [the] easement is appurtenant to the lands of Plaintiffs.” Defendant contends that the easement is not appurtenant to the lands of *210the plaintiffs but appurtenant to the lands of James C. Boozer and that the trial court should have directed a verdict in defendant’s favor on this issue. Alternatively, defendant argues that the language of the easement is ambiguous and that the trial court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- North Carolina National Bank v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Shingleton v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Hensley v. RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Thompson v. . UmbergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. Weaver-Rogers Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Intermount Distribution, Inc. v. Public Service Co. of North Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Edwards v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010