Duka v. U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION & ORDER
RICHARD M. BERMAN, District Judge.
“When a Federal court is properly appealed to in a case over which it has by law jurisdiction, it is its duty to take such jurisdiction_The right of a party plaintiff to choose a Federal court where there is a choice cannot be properly denied.” New Orleans Pub. Serv., Inc. v. New Orleans, 491 U.S. 350, 358, 109 S.Ct. 2506, 105 L.Ed.2d 298 (1989) (quoting Willcox v. Consol. Gas Co., 212 U.S. 19, 40, 29 S.Ct. 192, 53 L.Ed. 382 (1909))
I. Introduction
This is one of a series of cases which seeks to enjoin on constitutional grounds the United States…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Correctional Services Corp. v. MaleskoSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jarkesy v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Jarkesy v. SECCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- Tilton v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Bebo v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Hill v. Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.