Legal Opinion

Wetzel v. Cadillac Mutual Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1969No. Docket 4,347PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant insurance company issued a limited policy of automobile insurance to plaintiff 1 which included coverage against theft of plaintiff’s automobile. No coverage for personal injury or property damage was provided in the policy.

While training in South Carolina with the Michigan National Guard, plaintiff drove to a drinking establishment on the night of June 4, 1965. He parked and locked his car and went in. During the evening one of the men sitting at plaintiff’s table asked to use his car, but plaintiff refused. Later, while preparing to leave, plaintiff left the group for a few…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Casualty Ass'n of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. People v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Farm Bureau Insurance v. PedlowMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Callahan v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917
  5. Gocha v. FetterolfMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. GoodchildMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Hoye v. Westfield InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Driscoll v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  4. Tourism Industries v. HouriganSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API