Legal Opinion

Callahan v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 15, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $940 entered on the verdict of a jury; and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial in an action brought on a fire insurance policy issued by defendant to plaintiff on ox about September 17, 1915, whereby defendant insured until the 1st day of September, 1916, plaintiff’s automobile against damage by fire, theft, robbery or pilferage “ by any person or persons other than those in the employment, service or household of the insured.”

The complaint alleges and the proof establishes that plaintiff’s auto was stored in a…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lang v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Bolling v. Northern InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. Yazujian v. J. Rich Steers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Driscoll v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  5. Wetzel v. Cadillac Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API