Legal Opinion

X-Acto Crescent Products Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 7, 1951No. C. D. 1368PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of these protests consists of wooden boxes having hinged covers and internally arranged to hold small tools used by handicraft or hobby workers. The boxes were imported empty, the tools being placed therein after importation. Duty was assessed on the boxes at the rate of 25 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, for "manufactures of wood.” They are claimed to be properly dutiable at the rate of 16% per centum ad valorem under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. United States v. Lilly & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. United States v. Imperial Wall Paper Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Furniture Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Trumpf Medical Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
  3. Alexanders Dept. Stores, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. Alfred Orlik, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  5. Doniger Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API