Legal Opinion

People v. Lawson

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 2013No. E053349PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*111Opinion

KING, J,

I. INTRODUCTION

A jury found defendant, Brent Kerrigan Lawson, guilty of petty theft for stealing a $20 hoodie from a Walmart store. (Pen. Code, § 484, subd. (a).)1 The trial court found that defendant had four prior convictions for theft or burglary and served time for the offenses, making his current crime petty theft with prior convictions. (§ 666.)2

On this appeal, defendant claims his conviction for petty theft must be reversed because the trial court erroneously failed to instruct the jury, sua sponte, on the defense of mistake of fact. He argues the jury could have…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. SailleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. CovarrubiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. P. v. Petronella CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. People v. GivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. Jo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. People v. HendrixCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API