Legal Opinion

State v. Vandehey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 28, 1987No. 8509-1914; CA A38046PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

The state appeals an order suppressing evidence seized from defendant’s car after an accident. The trial court held that the search was illegal, because probable cause and exigent circumstances did not exist.1 We agree and affirm.

While defendant was driving home from the beach, she apparently attempted to pass a car and lost control when she swerved to avoid a collision with an oncoming car. A deputy sheriff arrived at 4:20 p.m. and observed a car in the ditch with defendant and small children inside. The deputy testified that two eyewitnesses told him that defendant’s driving had been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. AnspachOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. KockOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. State v. FixCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CromwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. CromwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API