Legal Opinion

State v. Cromwell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 13, 1991No. 10-89-00870; CA A64510Published

1Opinion of the Court

820 P.2d 888 (1991)

109 Or.App. 654

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,

v.

Michael Eric CROMWELL, Appellant.

10-89-00870; CA A64510.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted April 5, 1991.

Decided November 13, 1991.

Michael E. Ford, Springfield, waived oral argument for appellant. With him on the brief was Naslund, Budge & Ford, Springfield.

Michael C. Livingston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.

DE MUNIZ, Judge.

Defendant appeals…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. KockOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. TallmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. State v. CromwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API