Legal Opinion

Miller v. Harmon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 20, 1932No. 7639PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

Appellee D. C. Harmon, hereinafter called plaintiff, sued appellants Mrs. Alice Miller and her husband, E. C. Miller, and appellee W. E. Newton, for $105, alleged to be due for certain labor furnished Newton as general contractor in the erection of a residence for Mrs. Miller. Plaintiff also named as defendants Gilbert Wallace, D. A. Scoggins, and John Brown, hereinafter called interveners, who intervened claiming that the respective sums of $42.50, $54, and $54 were due them for labor furnished Newton in the erection of the residence for Mrs. Miller. And plaintiff and all inter-veners…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Franklin v. CoffeeTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Bassett v. MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Swope v. StantzenbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Jolesch & Chaska Co. v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Harkrider-Keith-Cooke Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hunt Developers, Inc. v. Western Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  2. Hayek v. Western Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Marek v. GoyenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. Lennox Industries, Inc. v. Phi Kappa Sigma Educational & Building Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API