Franklin v. Coffee
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Fayette. Tried below before the Hon. James H. Bell. The facts are stated in the Opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hemphill, Ch. J.
The appellant, Nicholas Franklin, was the owner of a tract of land a few miles from the town of Lagrange. He had not resided upon the land before his marriage ; and since his marriage lie had lived, under some arrangement, at the house of his mother-in-law in the town. Eight or ten years ago there was a small cabin built upon the land and a patch of two or three acres enclosed. There was no evidence that the improvements were made by'or for Franklin. A witness thought that another person, whom he named, made the improvements. A free negro occupied the cabin for a short time.…
2Cited by93 opinions
- INWOOD NORTH HOMEOWNERS'ASS'N v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- In the Matter of Kelly P. Bradley, Debtor. Kelly P. Bradley v. Pacific Southwest Bank, FsbCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Cullers v. JamesTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Archibald v. JacobsTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Rooms With a View, Inc. v. Private National Mortgage Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.