Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Atlantic, Gulf & Pacific Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia

Decided November 19, 1907No. 95PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. On plea to amended bill.

1Opinion of the Court

KELEER, District Judge.

The object of the plea is to compel the plaintiff to join as a party plaintiff the Bowers Southern Dredging Company, upon the ground that the latter company owns what amounts to an exclusive license within the territory described in the amended bill as that wherein the acts of infringement stated in the bill are alleged to have occurred. The amended bill, in paragraphs 20, 21, and 22, under the provisions of equity rule 21, makes the following statement and avoidance of one of the supposed defenses to the bill:

“(20) And your orator further shows unto your honors that it…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  3. Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Birdsell v. ShaliolSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Mitchell v. HawleySupreme Court of the United States · 1873

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nachod & United States Signal Co. v. Automatic Signal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  2. Holliday v. Long Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1955
  3. P. R. Mallory & Co. v. Automotive Mfrs' Outlet, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  4. Nachod & United States Signal Co. v. Automatic Signal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  5. Nachod & United States Signal Co. v. Automatic Signal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API