Nachod & United States Signal Co. v. Automatic Signal Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1DissentPatterson, Circuit Judge
I am of opinion that in a suit to obtain a patent under section 4915 of the Revised Statutes, 35 U.S.C. § 63, 35 U.S. C.A. § 63, an exclusive licensee under an adverse patent or application for patent is not an indispensable party defendant. Some of the reasoning in Parker Rust Proof Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co., 2 Cir., 105 F.2d 976, decided here March 6, 1939, is the other way, but in my opinion the reasoning as to this point should not be followed.
Section 4915 provides that when an application for patent has been denied by the Patent Office, the applicant may have remedy by bill in equity…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- United States v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.