Belt Casualty Co. v. Furman
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from judgments in favor of the defendant, William Furman, and the interveners in an action to rescind a policy of automobile indemnity insurance.
The policy was issued by the plaintiff to the defendant Furman in February, 1930. Under the contract the plain tiff agreed to indemnify the defendant against liability for bodily injuries resulting from the defendant’s operation of a certain De Soto automobile. In July, 1930, the defendant, while driving the automobile in San Francisco, collided with a street-car. As a result of the collision two passengers in his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Malmgren v. Southwestern Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Wright v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Boskowitz v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- McNeil v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Bogue v. RoethCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- County of San Bernardino v. Harsh California Corp.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Johnson v. Hayes Cal Builders, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Sanders v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. Superior Court (Good)California Supreme Court · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.