Legal Opinion
Arturo Rivera v. Debora Borgas, et al.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided March 4, 2026No. 2:24-cv-01072Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 ARTURO RIVERA, Case No. 2:24-cv-01072-RFB-BNW 7 Petitioner, ORDER 8 v. 9 DEBORA BORGAS, et al., 10 Respondents. 11 12 13 In this habeas corpus action, the respondents move to dismiss some of the claims in Arturo 14 Rivera’s second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 18), arguing that those 15 claims are unexhausted or procedurally defaulted in state court, not cognizable in this action, 16 and/or conclusory. ECF No. 30. The Court will deny the motion to dismiss without prejudice to 17 Respondents asserting the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Edwards v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.