Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 15, 1963No. Civ. 7117PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

This is an action to recover under the double indemnity provisions of a life insurance policy issued by the defendant insurance company, respondent herein, insuring a man named Wilson, since deceased, and designating the latter’s wife as beneficiary, who assigned her claim thereunder to the plaintiff appellant herein, Pertinent provisions of the policy declare: “If the death of the insured ... results, directly and independently of all other causes, from bodily injuries effected solely through external, violent and accidental means, ... and if such injuries are evidenced by a visible…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. McGrail v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Zuckerman v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. McGowan v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Behr v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. BunyardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. In Re Cheryl H.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Rafeiro v. American Employers' InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Simpson v. HeiderichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API