Legal Opinion

Smith v. Cross

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1911PublishedCited by 20 opinions

FROM SCOTT. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Scott County.— Hugh G-. Kyle, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

This was an ejectment bill filed in the chancery court of Scott county to recover about 250 acres of land. There are numerous defendants who claim through intermediate conveyances from one Richard Smith, the father of the complainants. The latter claim through their mother. The chancellor rendered his decree in favor of the complainants as to some of the defendants, and denied relief as to others; the difference in results as to the respective parties depending upon facts peculiar to the several conveyances. The complainants did not appear from any portion of the decree adverse to them except…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. McCorkleTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Boro v. HidellTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Dougherty v. ChesnuttTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Kittel v. StegerTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Hubbard v. GodfreyTennessee Supreme Court · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sartain v. Dixie Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  3. Moore v. BrannanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  4. Jones v. MosleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946
  5. Mercy v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API