Legal Opinion

Moore v. Brannan

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 3, 1957PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickers On, J.

This is an ejectment snit. Complainants, Charles C. Moore et al., bronght the snit against defendants, J. T. Brannan et al., to: (1) establish title; (2) regain possession; (3) remove defendants’ claim to the land as a elond upon complainants ’ title; and (4) for a reference to ascertain damages suffered by complainants because defendants cnt timber from complainants’ land.

The tracts of land in dispute are described in the bill, as follows:

‘ ‘ Situated partly in Marion and partly in Grundy Counties in the State of Tennessee, to-wit:

“ Beginning where the County line between Marion and Grundy…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Southern Coal & Iron Co. v. SchwoonTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Kittel v. StegerTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Southern Iron & Coal Co. v. SchwoonTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Manhattan Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. BedfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Keel v. SuttonTennessee Supreme Court · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of HenryIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Cooke v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  3. Bone v. LogginsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  4. Savely v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1967
  5. Blankenship v. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API